CT Mirror's independent, nonprofit journalism depends on reader support.
Create more of it with a tax-deductible donation today.
In the late 19th century, the English biologist and philosopher Thomas Henry Huxley -- a man known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his fierce defense of evolutionary science -- offered a sobering observation about the nature of scientific progress. "The great tragedy of science," he wrote, "is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact."
It was a lament not of pessimism, but of principle. For Huxley, the integrity of science lay not in clinging to elegant ideas, but in surrendering them when the evidence demanded it. In that painful act -- the sacrifice of intellectual comfort at the altar of truth -- he saw nobility. Today, Huxley's wisdom feels not only relevant, but urgent. Yet the tragedy he described has been reversed.
No longer are beautiful hypotheses being slain by ugly facts.
Instead, in our current age, beautiful lies are thriving -- sustained and amplified by algorithms, tribal loyalties, and a global information infrastructure that too often rewards virality over veracity. Conspiracy theories, misinformation, and deliberate disinformation are not simply fringe phenomena; they are mainstream forces shaping public policy, health outcomes, elections, and even personal identity.
What has changed is not the availability of facts, but our willingness to let them slay the illusions we prefer. Huxley believed deeply in the power of evidence and the responsibility of reason. In his time, this meant challenging creationist dogma with Darwin's radical idea of natural selection. It meant enduring public criticism, engaging in intellectual battle, and risking reputation to uphold a principle: that truth must govern belief -- not the other way around. He understood that humans are naturally drawn to explanations that flatter, simplify, or reassure. But he also knew that clinging to those explanations in defiance of evidence was a form of intellectual cowardice.
In our era, the beauty of a hypothesis is no longer measured by its elegance or coherence, but by its emotional resonance -- its ability to reinforce identity, stoke outrage, or confirm suspicion. A conspiracy theory, however baseless, offers a kind of narrative comfort: It suggests that nothing is random, that someone is in control, and that believers are part of a special group with hidden knowledge. Against this, the truth often feels inadequate -- too complex, too uncertain, too mundane. And so the fact, no matter how well-substantiated, is dismissed not because it fails to persuade, but because it fails to please.
This inversion of Huxley's ethic -- where loyalty to one's preferred narrative overrides commitment to observable truth -- has vast consequences. We saw it during the COVID- 19 pandemic, when misinformation about vaccines, masks, and treatments cost lives. We saw it during the 2020 U.S. presidential election, when a demonstrably false claim about election fraud incited an attack on the U.S. Capitol. We see it every day in social media ecosystems where fact-checks are dismissed as partisan spin, and where belief is a badge of belonging, not a conclusion reached through evidence.
To be clear, Huxley was not naïve. He knew that truth is often provisional -- that scientific facts evolve, and that skepticism has a place in intellectual inquiry. But his was a skepticism rooted in rigor, not reflex. He demanded that claims be tested, not simply believed. He trusted that a mind trained in critical thought could change course when new evidence emerged. That idea -- that one could be both skeptical and teachable -- is profoundly lacking in today's public discourse.
The age of misinformation thrives not only because lies are told, but because truth is devalued. What has eroded is not just the trust in institutions, but the very expectation that truth ought to matter. In many corners of public life, facts have become optional -- pieces to be accepted or discarded depending on their utility to a preferred worldview. This is not healthy skepticism. I read the other day that many scholars think that we are living through a period of epistemic nihilism, which means that too many of us have stopped believing that facts matter. That anything is knowable. That there is such a thing as shared truth.
In the face of this crisis, we are called to reclaim Huxley's ethic -- to reassert the discipline of letting ugly facts dismantle beautiful lies. That means teaching media literacy in schools as seriously as we teach math. It means demanding transparency from technology platforms whose algorithms profit from outrage and distortion. It means defending journalists, scientists, and educators who labor under threat and derision simply for telling the truth. And it means practicing, in our own lives, the humility to change our minds when confronted by better evidence.
The stakes are high. A society that abandons truth as its compass is a society adrift -- susceptible to authoritarianism, paralyzed in the face of crisis, and unable to solve problems that require collective understanding. In such a world, the lie is not merely unchallenged -- it is enthroned. And that, to borrow Huxley's word, is the true tragedy.
Let us be clear: facts are not always comfortable. They may call us to revise our beliefs, admit our errors, or reconsider our loyalties. But that is the price of living in a reality- based world. T.H. Huxley knew that intellectual courage meant more than clever argument -- it meant letting go of the beautiful idea when the facts made it untenable. In this age of digital distortion and cultivated confusion, that courage is more essential than ever.
If we are to reclaim the promise of science, democracy, and human progress, we must reaffirm the principle that Huxley articulated more than a century ago: that truth is not defined by preference, and belief must bow to evidence. Only then can we slay the seductive lie with the honest fact -- and preserve, however painfully, the dignity of reason.
As we face a future rife with emerging technologies -- AI-generated content, deepfakes, synthetic voices -- we must ask not just what is possible, but what is true. We must reject the temptation to make peace with falsehoods because they flatter our politics or soothe our fears. And we must insist, again and again, that the true tragedy is not that facts can be ugly -- but that lies, left unchallenged, can be deadly as they were on January 6th, 2021.
We are facing a civic emergency. T.H. Huxley gave us a framework for intellectual integrity. It is time we put it back at the center of our public life. The path forward may be uncomfortable, but it is the only one that leads to wisdom. In the slaying of our illusions lies the birth of our understanding. For without a shared understanding of reality, we become ungovernable. And if we lose truth, we risk losing the republic.